Some 2,800 German and Swiss biophysicists and energy medicine practitioners refer to the electromagnetic fields, rhythms and impulses that regulate life and organisms as “vital fields” (aka Vitalfeld).Today, Vitalfield technology is one of the leaders in biophysical medicine.
Vitalfeld machines measure over 200 million resonance points in the body in the first eight minutes, to pinpoint root causality of energy depletion or blockades. Diagnosis links to immediate, non-intrusive therapy. Targeted vitalfeld therapy supports specific functions of the body – such as endocrine, metabolic, cardiovascular, urogenital, brain, reproductive, lymph and immune systems – with resonant frequencies that transfer energy and information to where they are most needed.

Vitalfeld can also target specific organs, micro-organisms, cells, nerves, vessels and bone structures; to regulate toxic loads and metabolism; to support microbial balance; to counter allergies, inflammation and sensitivities; and to promote general vitality in people who are low on energy and high on stressors.

Vitalfeld technology is developed and manufactured by Swiss-German Vitatec Gmbh. It is being used today by prominent health practitioners and clinics to pinpoint and treat root causality of energetic issues rapidly and non-intrusively. Vitalfeld supports the body’s own healing mechanism by giving it energy where it’s most needed.

Overlapping Definitions:

• Biofields
• Vitalfeld
• Vital Fields
• Electromagnetic Therapy (EMT)
• Bioelectrodynamics
• Electromagnetic Biology
• Biophysical Medicine
• Frequency Medicine
• Vibrational Medicine
• Energy Medicine

Vitalfield has been used to support and healing and regeneration in a wide range of areas, such as:

• Athletic Performance (used by top Austrian Olympic athletes)
• Sports Injuries (Accelerated tissue healing)
• Energy and Vitality
• Burnout Prevention
• Chronic Fatigue
• Cardiac Issues
• Psychological Stress
• Memory Loss
• Digestive Issues
• Detoxing
• Destressing
• Autoimmune
• Chronic Disease

Four decades after Nikola Tesla suggested that the we are made entirely of energy and waves, quantum mechanics confirmed what was going on inside the atom, namely vibrations inside emptiness. Today we know that all matter – both organic and inorganic – vibrates with electromagnetic frequencies. The human body, cells, organs and micro-organisms generate specific electrical currents that flow through the tissues and therefore operate magnetic fields both within and around us.
Energy medicine, a tradition dating back to Chinese “chi” and Indian “prana” practices over 5,000 years ago, uses natural human energies of varying intensities and frequencies to stimulate the repair of tissues and enable built-in healing mechanisms to operate more effectively.

By 1884, an estimated 10,000 physicians were applying electromagnetic principles with simple electric devices for practical therapeutic purposes. Thousands of studies over the last century attest to the benefits of energy medicine. However, In 1910, The Flexner Report, funded by the Carnegie Foundation, established a basis for all medicine and clinical education that ignored ancient and validated energy-healing methods in favor of biochemical measurability.

Today we are looking at a revival of biophysical medicine. New clinical studies are showing significant results in enhancing fertility, for example. Accelerated healing from both internal and external stressors. Better resistance and overall energy.

VitalFeld applies natural frequencies to help our bodies receive, store, and release various kinds of energy and information for optimal functioning. It operates on a higher level of causality than chemistry, just as quantum physics operates on a higher level of causality than classical physics.

Both biochemistry (nutrients, chemicals) and biophysics (currents, fields) are critical to life, with an important difference: speed. Think of biochemistry as the central heater and biophysics as the electronic thermostat. Responding to a change in temperature outside, the thermostat sends a signal to the boiler at lightspeed, which then takes minutes or hours to heat up in response.

Life depends on the same principle, using light speed communication to coordinate slow chemical synthesis. This is how we are able to process over 400 billion actions per second between trillions of cells, organs and micro-organisms to maintain life’s complex functions.

All biophysical events operate under the laws of physics, where signals create interference patterns just like ripples in a pond, transferring and sharing energy and information from one object to another. The efficiency of this communication is measured by resonance. Vitalfeld technology is about measuring and improving the body’s resonance.

The latest science of epigenetics confirms the importance of biophysical fields in life. In the new biology, DNA is merely the blueprint for protein structures, whereas behavior itself is guided by environmental signals that are received by the cell’s membrane. A healthy body that is able to process and respond to external stressors flexibly is high in resonance, able to communicate efficiently, more adaptive to change outside and more resistant to stressors.

Environmental signals cover the gamut of life – from nutrition and chemicals to electromagnetic fields, sounds, light, radiation, our thoughts and emotions (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Theta frequencies) and also the fields generated by other organisms -, fauna, flora, and nature itself. They shape the commune of cells known as the human body.

Knowing this, we can choose to limit signals that undermine our health and support the ones that bring us more energy. Man-made electromagnetic fields such as cell phone radiation, for example, can undermine regulatory functions and cause cumulative cellular wear and tear. Mitochondria, the cellular energy plants that generate ninety-five percent of our total energy needs, operate with an electric principle that is particularly sensitive to electrosmog. Long-term damage to mitochondria is typical to most forms of chronic disease, which is why it’s important to start thinking about health also from a biophysical aspect.

VitalFeld counters the effects of electrosmog, and other environmental stressors, by enhancing the cells’ ability to produce energy (ATP).

• In 1923, Russian scientist Alexander Gurwitch discovers ultraweak photon emissions from living tissues in the UV-range of the spectrum, that have a stimulating effect on cell division. He calls it mitogenetic radiation.
• Austrian-American biologist Paul Weiss and German-American Hans Spemann, suggest that Gurwitch’s energy field influences the embryo.
• Biologist Rupert Sheldrake calls the ”morphic field” and proposes that it interacts with the human mind.
• Neuroanatomist Harold S. Burr from Yale University records electrical fields in the shape of matured bodies around eggs and baby animals in the 1940s, suggesting an electromagnetic blueprint for guiding growth.
• Herbert Fröhlich, nominated for Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963 and 1964, proposes an electromagnetic field that is generated by living cells in broad frequency ranges synchronizes molecules and information in the human body.
• Frits-Albert Popp, a theoretical biophysicist at the University of Marburg in Germany, discovers carcinogenic compounds that scramble cellular photo-repair mechanisms by emitting specific wavelengths.
• Popp and one of his graduate students, Bernhard Ruth, demonstrate with a highly sensitive photon detector how coherent emission of biophotons is linked to cellular health and incoherent emission to diseases such as cancer. They propose that biophotons provide system of communication between molecules
• Dr. Veljko Veljkovic discovers a method for predicting which chemicals are carcinogenic by calculating biophotonic properties of the molecules.
• Dr. Bruce Lipton, father of epigenetics, shows that cell regulation and behavior is regulated with environmental signals through the cell’s membrane rather than DNA, and biophysical signals trigger effects with and without chemical diffusion, further divulging the biophysical aspect of humanity
• Dr. Robert Becker, pioneer in the field of regeneration outlines the relationship between electrical currents and healing processes in animal and human limbs, spinal cords, and organs with extensive laboratory tests in the 1970s.
• Dr. Siegfried Kiontke, German biophysicist, releases first machines that mimic human electromagnetic fields for therapeutic purposes, calling them Vitalfelds (Vital Fields).
• The last few decades sees a mushrooming of research and studies linkin electric and electromagnetic phenomena to human function and behavior (see below).

Vitalfeld: Enhancing Reproductive Health

Dr. Josef Zech / Kinderwunsch Clinic, Innsbruck / 2019

Abstract

Specific electromagnetic frequency ranges that combine Schumann resonances, digitized orthomolecular spectra and other Vitalfeld spectra have increased sperm cell longevity on average by 35 percent in several ongoing clinical studies conducted by Kinderwunsch clinic with independent researchers. The peak longevity of Vitalfeld treated sperm is up to nine days, whereas the average sperm only survive three days on average. Same methodology has also been used to enhance egg cell vitality and to treat displaced eggs in the ovary. Studies are ongoing through 2019.

Interview with Dr. Zech

Electromagnetic Signals influence DNA Restructuring, Water Memory and Transmission

Dr. Luc Montagnier / Electromagnetic Biology And Medicine / 2014

Abstract

Specific electromagnetic signals (EMS) were used to restructure DNA and transmit the information into a clean water sample, confirmed by independent laboratory teams who were able to reconstruct the DNA. It demonstrates how DNA is able to fix itself and transmit the information through water molecules when subjected to specific EMS. The transduction effect has also been observed in living human cells, when coherent molecular interaction are supported with resonant frequencies.
Full Study Documentary film

Biofield: The Phantom Leaf Effect

Dr. John Hubacher / The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

Dr. John Hubacher measures the biological field of a leaf with corona discharge. The biofield remains intact even after the leaf is cut in half and the other part removed, with broad implications for biology and physics.

Full Study / Hubacher On Biofields

Vitalfeld: Supporting Athletic Performance, Bone and Fracture Healing, Regeneration

Private Clinics / The Journal of Athletic Training

Abstract

Energy and alternative medicine practitioners in Germany, Switzerland and Austria use Vitalfeld to diagnose and treat top athletes and sports professionals, observing significantly faster regeneration and healing in muscles, fascia, blood vessels, bones and even head. Vitalfeld is being used for torn ligaments, ligaments sprain, cartilage damage, torn muscle fibers, body bruises, back pain, shoulder injury with torn ligaments, concussions, inflammation, cicatrices, wound healing, influenza, allergies, food intolerance and various intestinal problems. Creatine kinase levels level out within the next day after treatment. The practitioners generally believe that the cumulative positive effects are primarily due to increased cellular energy, that helps the body regenerate faster. One clinic has created custom tools for competition and regeneration, used by some of the top competitive athletes in the country.

Marcel Hirscher Skiing 6 time Overall Champion skiing 6 times World Champion
Matthias Mayer Skiing Gold medal Dh Olympics Sotchi
Niki Hosp Skiing 10 time medalist in Alpine skiing. 3 Olympic medals
Andrea Fischbacher Skiing Olympic Gold Sg Vancouver
Julia Dujmovits, Snowboard Olympic Gold Sochi
Andreas Prommegger Snowboard 3 x Overall Champion
Thomas Morgenstern Ski jumping Olympic Gold medalist
Mario Stecher Nordic Combine Worldchampion and Olympic gold medalist team
Bernhard Gruber Nordic Combine Worldchampion and Olympic gold medalist team
Franz Klammer Skiing legend and Olympic champion
Heather Mills Speed record holder – disabled skiing
Matthias Lanzinger multiple Paraolympic medalist
Max Franz Skiing Downhill Bronze medalist World Champion 2017
Roland Leitinger Skiing GS Silber World champion 2017
Manuel Feller Skiing SL Silber World Champion 2017
Nici Schmidhofer Skiing DH Gold World Champion 2017

Study: The effect of low-frequency electromagnetic field on human bone marrow stem/progenitor cell differentiation

Article: 1978 New York Times Article extolling EMS treatment of fractures.

Vitalfeld: Significant Improvement In Tanzanian and European Study of 265 Chronic Patients

Forum Medizine / Die Naturheilkunde Report 2010

Abstract

In a statistical study involving 265 patients with a versatile set of chronic illnesses, 98 percent of Tansanians and 85 percent of Europeans reported significant health effects from Vitalfeld treatments, with an average of five treatments showing significantly reduced symptoms and pain.

See Published Study (German)

University Hospital Graz Study Shows High Accuracy of Vitalfeld Diagnosis

Clinical Institute For Medical And Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Graz – 2006

Abstract

In two independent studies by University Hospital Graz involving 44 patients with somatic diseases, extensive anamnesis was carried out with standard laboratory procedures and the results compared with Vitalfeld diagnostic (“Global Diagnostic”). All patient data was randomized and sent to third party for analysis. The biophysical, 8-minute measurement was able to confirm the main diagnosis made by classical medical methods for each patient in the study. The team concluded also that the digital scan can give indication to hidden or beginning pathological processes which can not yet be detected by conventional lab tests or diagnostics.

Graz University Study

Vitalfeld: Rapid Method For Detecting Cardiovascular Risk

Clinical Institute For Medical And Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Graz

Abstract

In a retrospective study of 143 patients suspected of suffering from cardiovascular disease or increased cardiovascular risk, the efficiency of Vitalfeld measurement was compared to conventional cardiovascular examination methods. The biophysical diagnostic succeeded in accurately detecting both the patients already suffering from a cardiovascular disease and the patients who – still free of symptoms – showed unambiguous evidence of commencing end organ damage or exhibited more than one synergistically effective risk factor with a high efficiency (a sensitivity of 93.6 % and a specificity of 79.4 %).

Graz University Study

Electric Fields Generated by Microtubules, Building Blocks of Cytoplasma

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling / 2012

Abstract

Microtubules maintain the structure of the cell and a variety of cellular processes with intracellular electric fields that facilitate mitosis and meiosis.

Full Study

• Adnan, Sohail, and Sher Azam. “The Integrative Brain Theory.” Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 6.7 (2015).
• Agnati, Luigi F., et al. “Functional roles of three cues that provide nonsynaptic modes of communication in the brain: electromagnetic field, oxygen, and carbon dioxide.” Journal of neurophysiology 119.1 (2017): 356-368.
• Agnati, Luigi F., et al. “The brain as a “hyper-network”: the key role of neural networks as main producers of the integrated brain actions especially via the “broadcasted” neuroconnectomics.” Journal of Neural Transmission 125.6 (2018): 883-897.
• Agrawal, Lokesh, et al. “Inventing atomic resolution scanning dielectric microscopy to see a single protein complex operation live at resonance in a neuron without touching or adulterating the cell.” Journal of integrative neuroscience 15.04 (2016): 435-462.
• Alekseichuk, Ivan, et al. “Intrahemispheric theta rhythm desynchronization impairs working memory.” Restorative neurology and neuroscience 35.2 (2017): 147-158.
• Almansour, Nahlah M., et al. “A bioactive peptide analogue for myxoma virus protein with a targeted cytotoxicity for human skin cancer in vitro.” Journal of biomedical science 19.1 (2012): 65.
• Anastassiou, Costas A., et al. “Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons.” Nature neuroscience 14.2 (2011): 217-223.
• Bonnefond, Mathilde, and Ole Jensen. “Gamma activity coupled to alpha phase as a mechanism for top-down controlled gating.” PloS one 10.6 (2015): e0128667.
• Cáceres, J. L. H., & Wright, G. (2018). Zika Virus Viewed Through the Resonant Recognition Model. Unraveling New Avenues for Understanding and Managing a Serious Threat. EJBI, 14(1), 11-17.
• Cao, Lin, et al. “Endogenous electric currents might guide rostral migration of neuroblasts.” EMBO reports 14.2 (2013): 184-190.
• Chawla, Aman. “On Axon-Axon Interaction via Currents and Fields.” (2017).
• Cosic, Irena, Drasko Cosic, and Katarina Lazar. “Cancer Related BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 Mutations as Analysed by the Resonant Recognition Model.” Journal of Advances in Molecular Biology 1.2 (2017).
• Cosic, Irena, Drasko Cosic, and Katarina Lazar. “Is it possible to predict electromagnetic resonances in proteins, DNA and RNA?.” EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics 3.1 (2015): 1.
• Cosic, Irena, Drasko Cosic, and Katarina Lazar. “Tesla, Bioresonances and Resonant Recognition Model.” Second International Congress Nikola Tesla-Disruptive innovation. 2017.
• Ćosić, Irena, et al. “Electromagnetic properties of biomolecules.” FME Transactions 34.2 (2006): 71-80.
• Cosic, Irena, JoseLuis Hernandes Caceres, and Drasko Cosic. “Possibility to interfere with malaria parasite activity using specific electromagnetic frequencies.” EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics 3.1 (2015): 1.
• Cosic, Irena, Katarina Lazar, and Drasko Cosic. “Prediction of Tubulin resonant frequencies using the Resonant Recognition Model (RRM).” IEEE transactions on nanobioscience 14.4 (2015): 491-496.
• Craddock, Travis JA, et al. “Anesthetic alterations of collective terahertz oscillations in tubulin correlate with clinical potency: Implications for anesthetic action and post-operative cognitive dysfunction.” Scientific reports 7.1 (2017): 9877.
• Creath, Katherine. “A look at some systemic properties of self-bioluminescent emission.” Optical Engineering+ Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2008.
• Crumpei, Gabriel, et al. “Physical-mathematical models for new paradigms in neuroscience. Part II–An electromagnetic theory of the brain.” Bulletin of Integrative Psychiatry O New Series O March 2017 O Year XXIII O No 1: 72.
• Davidson, Robert M., Ann Lauritzen, and Stephanie Seneff. “Biological water dynamics and entropy: a biophysical origin of cancer and other diseases.” Entropy 15.9 (2013): 3822-3876.
• del Rocío Cantero, María, et al. “Bundles of Brain Microtubules Generate Electrical Oscillations.” Scientific reports 8.1 (2018): 11899.
• del Rocío Cantero, María, et al. “Electrical oscillations in two-dimensional microtubular structures.” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 27143.
• Deng, Bin, et al. “Endogenous fields enhanced stochastic resonance in a randomly coupled neuronal network.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 68 (2014): 30-39.
• Dotta, B. T., C. A. Buckner, and R. M. Lafrenie. “Photon Emissions as Differential Indicators for Different Components of Protein Kinase A (PKA) in Transfected Murine Melanoma Cells.” Arch Can Res 4 (2016): 3.
• Dotta, Blake T. “Cosic’s Resonant Recognition Model for Macromolecules can be used to Predict and Modify the Fluctuating Wavelengths of Ultraweak Photon Emissions from Stressed Cancer Cells.” Biophysical Journal 106.2 (2014): 183a.
• Farnsworth, Keith D., John Nelson, and Carlos Gershenson. “Living is information processing: From molecules to global systems.” Acta biotheoretica 61.2 (2013): 203-222.
• Fels, Daniel. “The Double-Aspect of Life.” Biology 7.2 (2018): 28.
• Ford, Brian J. “Cellular intelligence: Microphenomenology and the realities of being.” Progress in biophysics and molecular biology (2017).
• Foster, Joshua J., et al. “The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory.” Journal of neurophysiology 115.1 (2015): 168-177.
• Funk, Richard HW. “Endogenous electric fields as guiding cue for cell migration.” Frontiers in physiology 6 (2015): 143.
• García I, S. V., & Hernández-Cáceres I, J. L. (2017). Studying Protein kinases PKCζ and PKMζ with the Resonant Recognition Model. Implications for the study of Memory Mechanisms. Revista Cubana de Informática Médica, 9(2), 121-134.
• Georgiev, D.D., et al. “Solitonic effects of the local electromagnetic field on neuronal microtubules”. (2013).
• Ghosh, Subrata, Daisuke Fujita, and Anirban Bandyopadhyay. “An organic jelly made fractal logic gate with an infinite truth table.” Scientific reports 5 (2015).
• Ghosh, Subrata, et al. “Design and construction of a brain-like computer: a new class of frequency-fractal computing using wireless communication in a supramolecular organic, inorganic system.” Information 5.1 (2014): 28-100.
• Ghosh, Subrata, et al. “Inventing a co-axial atomic resolution patch clamp to study a single resonating protein complex and ultra-low power communication deep inside a living neuron cell.” Journal of integrative neuroscience 15.04 (2016): 403-433.
• Goodman, G., and D. Bercovich. “Electromagnetic induction between axons and their schwann cell myelin-protein sheaths.” Journal of integrative neuroscience 12.04 (2013): 475-489.
• Goodman, G., et al. “The Two-Brains Hypothesis: Towards a guide for brain–brain and brain–machine interfaces.” Journal of integrative neuroscience 14.03 (2015): 281-293.
• Gregoriou, Georgia G., Sofia Paneri, and Panagiotis Sapountzis. “Oscillatory synchrony as a mechanism of attentional processing.” Brain research 1626 (2015): 165-182.
• Guschin, Vadim V., et al. “On the function of DNA magnetism.” (2018)
• Hammerschlag, Richard, et al. “Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an emerging discipline.” Global Advances in Health and Medicine 4.suppl (2015): 35-41.
• Helfrich, Randolph F., et al. “Neural mechanisms of sustained attention are rhythmic.” Neuron 99.4 (2018): 854-865.
• Huston, Ronald L. “A Review of Electromagnetic Activity in Cellular Mechanics.” Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology 7.09 (2016): 360.
• Iwasa, Stephanie N., Robart Babona-Pilipos, and Cindi M. Morshead. “Environmental factors that influence stem cell migration: an “electric field”.” Stem cells international 2017 (2017).
• Jaross, Werner. “Are Molecular Vibration Patterns of Cell Structural Elements Used for Intracellular Signalling?.” The open biochemistry journal 10 (2016): 12.
• Jaross, Werner. “Hypothesis on interactions of macromolecules based on molecular vibration patterns in cells and tissues.” Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) 23 (2018): 940-946.
• Jerman, Igor. “Emergence of Organisms from Ordered Mesoscopic States of Water (Liquids)—Physical Instead of Chemical Origin of Life.” Biological, Physical and Technical Basics of Cell Engineering. Springer, Singapore, 2018. 321-338.
• Jon Lieff – Electric DNA and Mind (March 8, 2015)
• Jon Lieff → Cellular Intelligence
• Kanev, Ivan, et al. “Searching for electrical properties, phenomena and mechanisms in the construction and function of chromosomes.” Computational and structural biotechnology journal 6.7 (2013): 1-13.
• Karbowski, L. M., et al. “Only 1% Melanoma Proportion in Non-Malignant Cells Exacerbates Photon Emissions: Implications for Tumor Growth and Metastases.” Int J Cancer Res Mol Mech 1.2 (2015).
• Karbowski, Lukasz M., Nirosha J. Murugan, and Michael A. Persinger. “Novel Cosic resonance (standing wave) solutions for components of the JAK–STAT cellular signaling pathway: A convergence of spectral density profiles.” FEBS open bio 5.1 (2015): 245-250.
• Karbowski, Lukasz M., Nirosha J. Murugan, and Michael A. Persinger. “Novel Cosic resonance (standing wave) solutions for components of the JAK–STAT cellular signaling pathway: A convergence of spectral density profiles.” FEBS open bio 5.1 (2015): 245-250.
• Kastrup, Bernardo. “There is an ‘unconscious,’but it may well be conscious.” Europe’s journal of psychology 13.3 (2017): 559.
• Kavitha, L., et al. “Localized discrete breather modes in neuronal microtubules.” Nonlinear Dynamics 88.3 (2017): 2013-2033.
• Kučera, Ondřej, and Michal Cifra. “Radiofrequency and microwave interactions between biomolecular systems.” Journal of biological physics 42.1 (2016): 1-8.
• Levin, Michael. “Endogenous bioelectrical networks store non‐genetic patterning information during development and regeneration.” The Journal of physiology 592.11 (2014): 2295-2305.
• Liu, Xiang, and Yifei Wang. “A modified resonant recognition model to predict protein-protein interaction.” Frontiers of Biology in China 2.3 (2007): 268-271.
• Lobikin, Maria, and Michael Levin. “Endogenous bioelectric cues as morphogenetic signals in vivo.” Fields of the Cell (2015): p. 283–302. ISBN: 978-81-308-0544-3.
• Ma, Jun, et al. “Phase synchronization between two neurons induced by coupling of electromagnetic field.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 307 (2017): 321-328.
• McFadden, Johnjoe. “The CEMI Field Theory Closing the Loop.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 20.1-2 (2013): 153-168.
• Mizuhara, Hiroaki, Naoyuki Sato, and Yoko Yamaguchi. “Cortical networks dynamically emerge with the interplay of slow and fast oscillations for memory of a natural scene.” NeuroImage 111 (2015): 76-84.
• Montagnier, Luc, et al. “Water bridging dynamics of polymerase chain reaction in the gauge theory paradigm of quantum fields.” Water 9.5 (2017): 339.
• Murugan, Nirosha J., et al. “Biophotonic markers of malignancy: Discriminating cancers using wavelength-specific biophotons.” Biochemistry and biophysics reports 13 (2018): 7-11.
• Murugan, Nirosha J., Lukasz M. Karbowski, and Michael A. Persinger. “Cosic’s Resonance Recognition Model for Protein Sequences and Photon Emission Differentiates Lethal and Non-Lethal Ebola Strains: Implications for Treatment.” Open Journal of Biophysics 5.01 (2014): 35.
• Nguyen, Quang-Thang, Ronan Fablet, and Dominique Pastor. “Protein interaction hotspot identification using sequence-based frequency-derived features.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60.11 (2013): 2993-3002.
• Nistreanu, A. “Collective Behavior of Water Molecules in Microtubules.” 3rd International Conference on Nanotechnologies and Biomedical Engineering. Springer Singapore, 2016.
• Pai, Vaibhav P., et al. “Endogenous gradients of resting potential instructively pattern embryonic neural tissue via notch signaling and regulation of proliferation.” The Journal of Neuroscience 35.10 (2015): 4366-4385.
• Persinger, Michael A., Nirosha J. Murugan, and Lukasz M. Karbowski. “Combined Spectral Resonances of Signaling Proteins’ Amino Acids in the ERK-MAP Pathway Reflect Unique Patterns That Predict Peak Photon Emissions and Universal Energies.” International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 4 (2015): 10.
• Pietak, Alexis Mari. “Electromagnetic resonance and morphogenesis.” Fields of the Cell (2015): 303–320. ISBN: 978-81-308-0544-3.
• Pietak, Alexis Mari. “Structural evidence for electromagnetic resonance in plant morphogenesis.” Biosystems 109.3 (2012): 367-380.
• Pockett, Susan. “Consciousness Is a Thing, Not a Process.” Applied Sciences 7.12 (2017): 1248.
• Pokorný, Jiří, et al. “Cancer—Pathological breakdown of coherent energy states.” Biophysical Reviews and Letters 9.01 (2014): 115-133.
• Pokorný, Jiří, et al. “Energy parasites trigger oncogene mutation.” International journal of radiation biology 92.10 (2016): 577-582.
• Pokorný, Jiří, Jan Pokorný, and Fedir Borodavka. “Warburg effect—damping of electromagnetic oscillations.” Electromagnetic biology and medicine 36.3 (2017): 270-278.
• Pokorný, Jiří, Jan Pokorný, and Jitka Kobilková. “Postulates on electromagnetic activity in biological systems and cancer.” Integrative Biology 5.12 (2013): 1439-1446.
• Pokorný, Jirı, et al. “Measurement of Electromagnetic Activity of Living Cells.”. PIERS Proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic, July 6–9, 2015.
• Polesskaya, Oksana, et al. “On possible role of DNA electrodynamics in chromatin regulation.” Progress in biophysics and molecular biology (2017).
• Preto, Jordane, et al. “Investigating encounter dynamics of biomolecular reactions: long-range resonant interactions versus Brownian collisions.” Fields of the Cell (2015): 215-228.
• Prevenslik, Thomas. “Synapse by QED Induced Radiation.”
• Ren, Guodong, Ying Xu, and Chunni Wang. “Synchronization behavior of coupled neuron circuits composed of memristors.” Nonlinear Dynamics 88.2 (2017): 893-901.
• Riss, U. “Electrodynamic Binning Theory versus Induced Fit Theory.” Journal of Life Medicine, 2.2 (2014): 32-38.
• Ross, C. (2011). Creencias tradicionales y campos electromagnéticos. AIBR, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 6(3), 269-288.
• Ross, Christina L. “The use of electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic field for directed cell migration and adhesion in regenerative medicine.” Biotechnology progress 33.1 (2017): 5-16.
• Rouleau, Nicolas, and Blake T. Dotta. “Electromagnetic fields as structure-function zeitgebers in biological systems: environmental orchestrations of morphogenesis and consciousness.” Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 8 (2014).
• Sahu, Satyajit, et al. “Live visualizations of single isolated tubulin protein self-assembly via tunneling current: effect of electromagnetic pumping during spontaneous growth of microtubule.” Scientific reports 4 (2014).
• Sepehri, Alireza. “A mathematical model for DNA.” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 14.11 (2017): 1750152.
• Shiha, G., et al. “1174 A Novel Method for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus Using Electromagnetic Signal Detection: A Multicenter International Study.” Journal of Hepatology 58 (2013): S477.
• Shiha, Gamal, et al. “A Novel Method for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus Using Electromagnetic Signal Detection: A Multicenter International Study.” biosystems 7 (2014): 12.
• Shishkin, Gennady G., et al. “Research of water response under the action of the infrared human body radiation by water conductometric sensors.” Open Journal of Applied Sciences 3.03 (2013): 278.
• Singh, P., et al. “DNA as an Electromagnetic Fractal Cavity Resonator: Its Universal Sensing and Fractal Antenna Behavior.” Soft Computing: Theories and Applications. Springer, Singapore, 2018. 213-223.
• Swain, John. “On the possibility of large upconversions and mode coupling between frohlich states and visible photons in biological systems.” arXiv preprint physics/0603137 (2006).
• ter Wal, Marije, and Paul H. Tiesinga. “Phase difference between model cortical areas determines level of information transfer.” Frontiers in computational neuroscience 11 (2017): 6.
• Tseng, AiSun, and Michael Levin. “Cracking the bioelectric code: probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation.” Communicative & integrative biology 6.1 (2013): 13192-200.
• Turton, David A., et al. “Terahertz underdamped vibrational motion governs protein-ligand binding in solution.” Nature communications 5 (2014).
• Tzambazakis, Antonios. “The evolution of the biological field concept.” Fields of the Cell (2015): 1–27.
• Voloh, Benjamin, et al. “Theta–gamma coordination between anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex indexes correct attention shifts.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.27 (2015): 8457-8462.
• Watrous, Andrew J., et al. “More than spikes: common oscillatory mechanisms for content specific neural representations during perception and memory.” Current opinion in neurobiology 31 (2015): 33-39.
• Wells, Jonathan. “Membrane patterns carry ontogenetic information that is specified independently of DNA.” BIO-complexity 2014 (2014).
• Wnuk, Marian J., and Casimir D. Bernard. “The Electromagnetic Nature of Life-The Contribution of W. Sedlak to the Understanding of the Essence of Life.” Frontier Perspectives 10.1 (2001): 32-35.
• Xu, Ying, et al. “Collective responses in electrical activities of neurons under field coupling.” Scientific reports 8.1 (2018): 1349.
• Zhao, Yue, and Qimin Zhan. “Electric fields generated by synchronized oscillations of microtubules, centrosomes and chromosomes regulate the dynamics of mitosis and meiosis.” Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 9.1 (2012)
• Zhao, Yue, and Qimin Zhan. “Electric oscillation and coupling of chromatin regulate chromosome packaging and transcription in eukaryotic cells.” Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 9.1 (2012): 1.
• Zhao, Yue. “Centrosome Functions as a Molecular Dynamo in the Living Cell.” Advances in bioscience and biotechnology (Print) 6.7 (2015): 452.